<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Richard,<br><br>please check: mkgmap treats except=psv like execpt=bus, and I think that's correct.<br><br>Gerd<br><br><div>Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:47:25 -0500<br>From: rwelty@averillpark.net<br>To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Route Restrictions<br><br><pre>On 12/20/13 10:20 AM, GerdP wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>><br>> okay, I think I understand now better. <br>> mkgmap r2889 writes all route restrictions<br>> so that they prohibit pedestrians and emergency vehicles.<br>> RouteRestriction contains this:<br>> HEADER = 0x004005;<br>> If I change that to <br>> 0x004605<br>> (as the wiki suggests) routing is allowed for pedestrians and emergency.<br>><br>> So, we can control whether restrictions apply to pedestrians and emergency.<br>><br>> Now I wonder if the old behaviour was intended? <br>> I think no. Both emergency and pedestrians can ignore<br>> signs like "no left turn", can't they?<br>><br>it's something that can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction but<br>i looked it up for New York state and the vehicle and traffic<br>code there explicitly gives emergency vehicles engaged in<br>a response permission to ignore turn restrictions and traffic<br>control devices.<br> <br>but it's something you'd have to look up for each jurisdiction.<br>when i set up no-u-turn restrictions for motorways in the US,<br>i always add the except=psv tag so that it's made explicit.<br> <br>richard<br> <br> <br></pre><br>_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</div> </div></body>
</html>