<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi Marko,<br><br>okay, if I hear no complains I'll merge it tomorrow.<br><br>Gerd<br><br><div>> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:18:10 +0300<br>> From: marko.makela@iki.fi<br>> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] r3174 in via_ways branch<br>> <br>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:46:34AM +0200, Gerd Petermann wrote:<br>> >I think the branch is ready for trunk now.<br>> <br>> Me too. While I did not test routing, it seems that you did that on <br>> behalf for me (in Finland). I checked the warning messages, and I think <br>> that they all are clear and warranted now.<br>> <br>> >I did a few more tests regarding turn restrictions with via ways. It <br>> >seems that they are working, but the effect is minimal. In Finland, <br>> >they are (now) used only in no_u_turn restrictions, and the Garmin <br>> >algo seems to avoid these u-turns anyway if alternatives are available.<br>> <br>> I guess that the impact is bigger in places like California, where they <br>> have dual oneways and they only allow left-turns and U-turns in certain <br>> intersections. Then it is common that you will have to drive slightly <br>> past your destination, make a U-turn a few intersections later, and then <br>> make a right-turn.<br>> <br>> I have not checked the mapping detail in those areas. If these <br>> dual-oneways are already mapped as such in OSM (instead of being mapped <br>> as one two-way street), no turn restrictions would be needed.<br>> <br>> Marko<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<br>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>