<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Gerd,</div><div><br></div><div><div>I'm sorry the delay to answer, but I came on vacation and had many pending issues waiting for me.</div><div>Regard this specific issue, your interpretation of the problem of duplication/overlap in the numbering interpolation is correct. In fact the data doesn't make sense and I agree with you that this case is an error in the data.</div><div><br></div><div>To prove this, I got the short example sent before and correctly input the numbers eliminating the overlapping as shown below:</div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div><img src="cid:ii_14f4212a51932f71" alt="Imagem inline 3" style="margin-right: 0px;"><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>And then I compiled the map with mkgmap versions 3612 and 3629 (the last one I found) and the numbers were not "missed" this time, proving you theory.</div><br><div><i style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"><font face="arial narrow, sans-serif">Snapshot taken form MapSource of a map compiled wiht mkgmap r3612</font></i><br></div><div><img src="cid:ii_14f4204bfbc0271b" alt="Imagem inline 1" width="424" height="311"><br></div><div><br></div><div><i style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"><font face="arial narrow, sans-serif">Snapshot taken form MapSource of a map compiled wiht mkgmap r3629</font></i><br></div><div><img src="cid:ii_14f420a261c50783" alt="Imagem inline 2" style="margin-right: 0px;"><br></div><div><br></div><div>So I think we can close the case and I have some work do clean the maps of my group.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks again for your attention and analysis.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Alexandre Loss</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-07-21 9:06 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Loss <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alexandre.loss@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexandre.loss@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Hi Gerd and Steve,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks by your attention.</div><div>I'm in vocation now and without access to my computer, so I can't provide more information if you need till my return in beginning of August.</div><div>But I think that the data is correct because in despite the streets have the same name, they are different road since they aren't connect (there is a gap / a block between them).</div><div>So I believe that the algo couldn't consider the name of street.</div><div>But I understand your point of view, since it looks that can have a number overlapping/shadow of both streets, what would be a logical error.</div><div><br></div><div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Unfortunately</span>, I can make more test these days but as soon I come back I will.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks, </div><div><br>Alexandre<div><div><br></div><div>(Enviado via iPad)</div></div></div><div><div class="h5"><div><br>Em 21/07/2015, às 06:21, Gerd Petermann <<a href="mailto:gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com" target="_blank">gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi Alexandre,<br><br>I think the problem here is that you have two ways named "RUA PORTO ALEGRE",<br>one with id 2, the other with id 46, and both are in the same city.<br>So far no problem, but the addr:interpolation ways on those two roads<br>also produce a bunch of duplicate numbers. <br>As a result, the new algo decides to ignore them.<br>Unfortunately, the log <br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster RUA PORTO ALEGRE 2(0) 2(1)<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster RUA PORTO ALEGRE 3(0) 3(1)<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13</a> 800..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14</a> 801..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65</a> 419..205, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65</a> 203..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66</a> 418..204, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66</a> 202..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br>FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: found problems with interpolated numbers from addr:interpolations ways for roads with name RUA PORTO ALEGRE<br><br><br>is not very clear about the reason and the final action, but I think the data is not okay and the algo is correct<br>to ignore it.<br><br>What do you think?<br>Gerd<br><br><div><hr>Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:04 -0300<br>From: <a href="mailto:alexandre.loss@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexandre.loss@gmail.com</a><br>To: <a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>CC: <a href="mailto:Adm_Tec_Tracksource@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">Adm_Tec_Tracksource@googlegroups.com</a><br>Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the r3602<br><br><div dir="ltr">Hi Andrzej,<div><br></div><div>Ok, thank you for your time and analyses.</div><div>Lets wait for Gerd.<br><div><br></div><div>regards,</div><div>Alexandre</div><div><div><br></div></div></div><div><br><div>2015-06-17 13:13 GMT-03:00 Andrzej Popowski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:popej@poczta.onet.pl" target="_blank">popej@poczta.onet.pl</a>></span>:<br><blockquote style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Alexandre,<br>
<br>
I confirm, that there is no address on your map with current mkgmap. Data seems to be OK, so lets wait for Gerd opinion.<div><div><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Andrzej<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a>
<a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a></div> </div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>mkgmap-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a></span><br><span><a href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" target="_blank">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a></span></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>