<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Minko</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Yes, 0x53 sounds good ; I have 53 down as 'flat , mud "</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>r</p>
<p>Nick<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/09/2018 09:05, lig fietser wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:HE1PR0502MB38023BCE9F3B147A2B8DE87BD7140@HE1PR0502MB3802.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Hi Nick,<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Remarkable that this have not been noticed already!</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I would suggest polygon type 0x53, typ viewer shows this as is
the non NT version of
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">0x10C06 (if that
matters). And please add natural=sand.
<br>
</span></font></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">Suggestion:</span></font><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
natural=beach | natural=sand [0x53 resolution 20]<br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>Van:</b>
mkgmap-dev <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk"><mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk></a>
namens nwillink <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:osm@pinns.co.uk"><osm@pinns.co.uk></a><br>
<b>Verzonden:</b> woensdag 26 september 2018 23:04<br>
<b>Aan:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<b>Onderwerp:</b> [mkgmap-dev] Beaches as a polygon</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span
style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi<br>
<br>
<br>
I noticed that the default style only renders Beaches as a
point not a<br>
polygon.<br>
<br>
Beaches as a polygon may be unimportant to many but I
feel that without<br>
them maps are very misleading and incomplete -<br>
<br>
see picture<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/437/beach.jpg"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/437/beach.jpg</a><br>
<br>
(left default style , right with beach)<br>
<br>
Garmin deems them important as they are included as an
option in their kmtf<br>
files for their City Navigator maps and nuvis etc.<br>
<br>
Given the fact that only a very limited number of polygons
are used in a<br>
kmtf file, the beach inclusion seems quite significant.<br>
<br>
They use 0x10C06 in City Navigator.<br>
<br>
Just a suggestion<br>
<br>
r.<br>
<br>
<br>
Nick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Sent from: <a
href="http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a
href="http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>