<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Thank you, Ticker. I was able to run this program w/o issues even on Linux (via wine). Statistics tab gives quite a shallow view, it is not able to answer questions like:</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div> - am I saving any space if I don't include "name" in the point (restaurants without name)? In other words: how much data is used for labels or other attributes. Does it make any sense to use shorter labels or group them (pizza foo and pizza bar becomes "pizza" - will it be reused?)<br></div><div> - How many kBs is taken by 50000 footways or 1000 polylines. The count itself is not really helpful</div><div>- Is there any padding involved so it makes sense to make labels shorter just "enough" to not waste a single byte<br></div><div>- Other statistics - data cannot be exported easily (even via clipboard)</div><div><br></div><div>That means it's still going to be a lot of trial & error (if I do this - am I getting a smaller output and by how much?).<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:36 PM Ticker Berkin <<a href="mailto:rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk">rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Jose<br>
<br>
GPSMapEdit from <br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.geopainting.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.geopainting.com/</a><br>
<br>
can tell you some of this. The free version should do; install it and<br>
open gmapsupp.img or an individual tile. Then look at Map Properties ><br>
Statistics tab.<br>
<br>
Ticker<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 15:31 +0100, jose1711 wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
> can someone recommend a way how I can learn more about what the<br>
> detailed statistics in respect to the byte size of each element in the<br>
> map generated by mkgmap? What I am looking for is something like:<br>
> - lines: 3.2 MB<br>
> - road_class 0: 1.3 MB<br>
> - road_class 1: 1.2 MB<br>
> - road_class 2: 0.3 MB<br>
> ..<br>
> - points: 1.0 MB<br>
> - symbol 0x2c04: 0.3 MB<br>
> - symbol 0x4c00: 0.2 MB<br>
> Not sure if it makes any sense but the rationale behind is having an<br>
> tool that would provide some hints as to which map details can be<br>
> sacrificed when trying to cover the largest area of the map.<br>
> Thanks,<br>
> jose<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
> <a href="https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mkgmap-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk" target="_blank">mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev</a></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br></div>