Rev 3840 |
Last modification |
Compare with Previous |
View Log
| RSS feed
Last modification
- Rev 3850 2017-03-17 09:58:08
- Author: gerd
- Log message:
- - add support for short syntax with two type definitions
- make sure that rules inside an if / else block have at least a dummy expression like () so that we know where a new rule starts
A=1 & B=1 [0x1 resolution 24][0x10801 resolution 18]
# short form for
# A=1 & B=1 [0x1 resolution 24 continue]
# A=1 & B=1 [0x10801 resolution 18]
This no longer works:
if (expression) then
{name ...}
[0x1 resolution]
end
as it was not clear if this means one ot two rules
You can use
if (expreession) then
() {name ...}
[0x1 resolution]
end
if one rule was meant or
if (expression) then
() {name ...}
() [0x1 resolution]
end
for two rules. Of course this makes only sense if expression is a very complex term.