[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
From Torsten Leistikow de_muur at gmx.de on Tue Jul 7 15:02:31 BST 2009
Mark Burton schrieb: > If a way has a bollard on a point, the segments of the way that > connect to the bollard have access restrictions placed on them. By > default, a bollard implies: access=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes. How about a little more general approach? I would propose the following: If a way has a note with an access restriction, the segments of the way that connect to the node have the access restrictions from the node placed on them. This would have the following advantages: - With such an a feature, you would not only handle bollards, but also gates and other obstacles. - You need not to use a default access restrictions, but you can rely on the restriction in the data base. If no access restriction is defined in the data, you can still imply one via the style file. (I don't know, whether such a style rule would be applied in time before you place the restrictions on the way?) - The maps would be still usable, if it is run with with false vehicle settings. (Only the car setting seems to provide a real good routing, so to get good a bicycle routing, you need a specially generated map run in the car-mode). What do you think about such a modification? Gruss Torsten
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list