[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
From Mark Burton markb at ordern.com on Tue Jul 7 16:33:03 BST 2009
Hi Dermot, > Yes but... > > 2009/7/7 Mark Burton <markb at ordern.com>: > > > My testing indicates the later. If there is no other route, mapsource > > at least, ignores the restriction. > > Consider a case where you have a very simple configuration which I > shall try to draw in ASCII: > > > > | > | > | > +---------------x-------------o----------- > | > | > | > > > Let "o" be the bollard and x your destination. For badness, let's also > assume that there is only a single way segment between o and the > junction at "+". > > So now the entire piece of road from junction to x is access=no. Do > you think the restriction will be ignored in this case? Yes, mapsource ignores the restriction. > (maybe this won't matter in the real world, I'm just saying it now in > case it could be. I suppose the harder and more correct solution would > be to carve off 5m either side of the bollard into separate restricted > segments) I had already considered doing that but it's not worth it unless the real GPS units behave differently from mapsource. Cheers, Mark
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] - beware of the bollards!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list