logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Memory limits for mkgmap and splitter

From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Fri Aug 7 15:49:29 BST 2009

Before patches I gained about 5% by extrackting witz 7z unpacker on
commandline, before running the splitter (however compiled 10 days ago, so
excluding the lates changes).

2009/8/7 Clinton Gladstone <clinton.gladstone at googlemail.com>

> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Chris Miller<chris.miller at kbcfp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've got 4 cores (8 with hyperthreading) so this is something I'm acutely
> > aware of. Watching my PC churn away at only 12.5% CPU for a few hours
> isn't
> > my idea or resources well spent! Unfortunately there's no quick win
> because
> > the XML parsing is very linear, but I have already been considering
> various
> > options and certainly plan to give them a try at some point. I've got
> quite
> > a few other improvements planned that'll come first though.
>
> Just out of interest, what performance gains (or disadvantages) would
> there be to working with uncompressed files, instead of bz2 and gz
> files?
>
> Would this be faster for those of us with copious amounts of disk
> space, or would the extra IO negate any CPU-related performance gains?
>
> I know that Osmosis performance on multi-core systems can apparently
> be improved by piping the OSM file through a decompression program,
> but I assume that would not be practical for Splitter which must make
> several passes through the file.
>
> Cheers.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090807/74bc0cad/attachment.html 


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list