[mkgmap-dev] Should inter tile routing still work when splittingSplitter results again?
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Wed Sep 30 10:35:20 BST 2009
Ralf Kleineisel wrote: > On 09/30/2009 11:01 AM, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > > >> (For what it is worth, three tiles are enough for entire Finland when using >> the default mkgmap style. Many tracks and cycleways are still missing, as >> are most buildings. So, this may change at some point.) >> > > For Germany I need 60 tiles right now. I used --max-nodes=800000. The > resulting .img files are between 5.3 MB and 21 MB. As fewer tiles mean > better routing performance I'd like to keep the tile number as low as possible. > I get by on Germany with --max-nodes=1,300,000, max .img size is from 9-26MB. It really depends on the style (35 tiles) Countries like the Netherlands or Denmark need much much lower numbers - 450,000 however (don't ask me why). For some other countries I need around 1,000,000. I also don't think that a predefined list will get us along very far. Data and styles differ too much. While one style might crap out here, another style craps out there because of different preferences. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20090930/0e2cdbe3/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Should inter tile routing still work when splittingSplitter results again?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Should inter tile routing stillwork when splittingSplitter results again?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list