[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v4] make DP filter avoid removing points located at nodes
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Fri Nov 27 17:45:01 GMT 2009
Mark Burton wrote: > Felix, > > >> Yeah, I'm happy about it. Don't you want to commit the >> multiple_elements_patch at the same time? >> It's working great for me and many others since a long time. Never >> noticed any bad effect (well only that it could be even better by also >> allowing to put multiple oneways contraflowing, currently it only allows >> one routable line/object) >> > > OK, I have committed the patch you've just tested. > > Please make a new patch based on 1406 that contains the multiple > elements stuff and post that and I will commit it (after a swift glance > to check that it's not completely mad). > Here you go - based on 1408 and tested that it works fine without problems. > Cheers, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20091127/fc763cc6/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: multiple_elements_based_on_1408.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 8241 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20091127/fc763cc6/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v4] make DP filter avoid removing points located at nodes
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1405: Remove boundary from CoordNode class as Coord has a similar field.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list