logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] remove bogus nodes

From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Sat Nov 28 08:26:53 GMT 2009


Mark Burton wrote:
> Felix,
>
>   
>> Here's the lines I had to comment out:
>>
>> # route1=ferry     { name '${name1}'; set toll=yes }                    
>> [0x06 road_class=1 road_speed=0 resolution 18 continue]
>> # route=ferry     { name '${name} ferry' | 'ferry'; set toll=yes }     
>> [0x06 road_class=1 road_speed=0 resolution 18 continue]
>>
>> route1=ferry are ferries from relations.
>>     
>
> I can't see what's wrong at the moment. In your style file do any other
> rules match the ferry route (will any other lines be output for it?)
>   
Well I don't explicitly search for anything else with "& route=ferry". 
However I match the ferry itself two times. First time I match the ferry 
via relations file, the second time I match the way itself. No other 
rule matches.

Here's my relations file entry:
route=ferry             & name=*        { apply { set name1 = '${name} 
ferry' | 'ferry'; add fromrelation=yes; add route1=ferry; set toll=yes } }
route=ferry                     { apply { add fromrelation=yes; add 
route=ferry; set toll=yes } }
>   
>> Did not notice any improvements on autorouting so far however (only 
>> tried in Mapsource).
>>     
>
> You may see some improvement where routable ways share a lot of points
> with areas and other unroutable lines.
>   
The crazy thing is that routing works less well. Maybe my introducing of 
identical copies of the ways for displaying like routes and cycleway=* 
improves routing on such ways?
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20091128/52498f68/attachment.html 


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list