[mkgmap-dev] Don't let action rule execute its actions if its type isn't going to be used
From Torsten Leistikow de_muur at gmx.de on Wed Dec 2 15:59:18 GMT 2009
Hallo, I am glad that the continue statement finally made it into the trunk, but I am nor sure, when to use this with_actions flag and when not. And can anybody describe the difference in this regard, between the trunk and the style-branch? In my style I have the following lines in the polygon file: # set access blanking access=* & access!=yes & highway=* {set access_blanking=yes} access=* & access!=yes & railway=* {set access_blanking=yes} access=* & access!=yes & landuse=residential {set access_blanking=yes} access=* & access!=yes & landuse=industrial {set access_blanking=yes} access=* & access!=yes & leisure=garden {set access_blanking=yes} access=no & access_blanking!=yes [0x22 resolution 22 continue] access=private & access_blanking!=yes [0x22 resolution 22 continue] Now I have an example way with the follwoing tags: highway=service access=private With the style-branch the first rule is executed and the tag access_blanking=yes is added. All other rules do not match any more afterwards. With the trunk I get a polygon of the type 0x22, so obviously the first rule has no effect and the sixth rule is executed. Do I need to add here some kind of the with_actions flag, so that the example will work as expected? Or how can this be done with the actual trunk? I still haven't understood the with_actions flag completely. Can someone please provide an easy example, wich demonstrates the different results, whether the with_actions flag is used or not? Gruss Torsten
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Don't let action rule execute its actions if its type isn't going to be used
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Sharpened DP filter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list