[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] grok unpavedness
From Steve Hosgood steve at tallyho.bc.nu on Wed Dec 9 12:16:40 GMT 2009
Marko Mäkelä wrote: >> As far as I read Steve Hosgood's remarks, it looks like anyone could be >> tempted into adding mkgmap:ferry tags to OSM, but that sounds at least a >> bit odd to me. Or don't I understand Steve's remarks here? >> > > Steve, was this just a misunderstanding? As of r1425, the mkgmap default > line style adds mkgmap:unpaved and mkgmap:ferry attributes. I see that > Felix (extremecarver) suggested some further attributes that indicate > unpavedness. I will probably incorporate those to the default style. > > Yeah - it's a misunderstanding. Felix was quite right in an earlier post, it just took me a bit longer to catch up! I obviously have no objection to temporary tags used during the rewriting process in mkgmap's style-file handling. Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20091209/611d26b2/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] grok unpavedness
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] grok unpavedness
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list