[mkgmap-dev] Splitter details question
From Johann Gail johann.gail at gmx.de on Wed Jan 13 21:53:19 GMT 2010
> I've investigated doing this in the past however it's very tricky to do correctly > without having a huge impact on performance and/or memory requirements. I > do have one idea that might work without too much slowdown. If I was to build > up a big disk index of all nodes (there is already a disk cache of node details, > but it's not currently indexed), I could then lookup all nodes that weren't > found in the current tile and write them out too. It's a reasonable amount > of work to build the b-tree index efficiently but it's sort-of on the todo > list already anyway since I'm aware of other uses for something like this > too. > > You know that there are free implementations for b-trees? Look e.g. at http://bplusdotnet.sourceforge.net/ which offers you a java class, which includes storage to a file stream. Regards, Johann
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter details question
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter details question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list