[mkgmap-dev] oneway=reverse handling broken.
From Torsten Leistikow de_muur at gmx.de on Fri Jan 22 15:56:55 GMT 2010
Felix Hartmann schrieb am 22.01.2010 16:30: > highway=* & copy=99 & mtb:scale:uphill!=5 & mtb:scale:uphill!=4 { > set dontadd=yes; set taxi=no; set dontadd=oneway; set mkgmap:unpaved=1 > } [0x10711 resolution 21 continue with_actions] *output* Actually, what is the difference between "continue with_actions" and "continue"? I think I have never really understood, which version must be used in what case. Can you provide an easy example, wich demonstrates the different results, whether the with_actions flag is used or not? Gruss Torsten
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] oneway=reverse handling broken.
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] oneway=reverse handling broken.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list