[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1540: Change the signature of resolveType so that continue
From Torsten Leistikow de_muur at gmx.de on Sun Jan 31 20:30:52 GMT 2010
Steve Ratcliffe schrieb am 30.01.2010 16:13: > No it was just a mistake, I meant it is as if with_actions is always > given - I find the terminology very confusing! I would prefer that > continue not change the normal effect of the actions and there be a > without_actions (or no_carry_forward or no_propagate which would be more > descriptive of what happens) command that prevented the carry forward. I would approve such a change. In my opinion the "with_actions" is the more usual/natural case and so it should be the default. I think, the command for the other case should still include "actions", so that it is clear, what is not propagated. Or perhaps a wording without a negation, e.g. "actions_only_here". When I have the following lines in my style file key1=value1 {set first_action=true} key1=value1 {set second_action=true} [0x01 resolution 20 no_propagate continue] first_action=true & second_action!=true [0x02 resolution 20] I would assume, that two lines will be created. I.e. the actions of the first rule are propagated, and the actions of the second rule are only applied locally. Do you agree? Gruss Torsten
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1540: Change the signature of resolveType so that continue
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1541: Remove RuleHolder which no longer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list