[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] heed the through_route relation when adjusting turn headings
From Paul news at pointdee.co.uk on Wed Feb 10 17:01:24 GMT 2010
Worked for me earlier today on a TOTSO that was previously missed. Cheers Paul On 06/02/10 18:43, Mark Burton wrote: > v2 - no longer requires the node to have role "junction" > > This patch also includes two other changes to the heading adjustment > code: > > When matching arcs, as a last resort, match road class and speed. > > If at a node, an outgoing arc cannot be matched to an incoming arc by > possiblySameRoad(), try to find a single outgoing arc that has the > same road class and speed as the incoming arc and use that. > > and: > > When adjusting turn headings apply all relevant adjustments. > > Previously, if a heading needed adjusting because the delta from the > outgoing arc was too small, it did not then consider whether the delta > from the incoming arc was too small also. Now, it considers both cases > and adjusts the heading as appropriate. > > So please test even if you are not adding any through_route relations > and if you see any notable changes (good or bad) please say. > > -------------------- > > This new relation (type through_route) specifies which 2 ways are the > "through route" at a junction. The relation requires 2 ways (no role > required) and a node with role = junction. It should only be used at > those junctions where the through route cannot be reliably inferred > from the ways' names and/or refs. > > Here's an example from my local town: > > | 1 > | / > | / > |/ > A > | > | > | > | > B > /| > / | > / | > 2 | > > The vertical road is the "through route", i.e. you can drive from one > end to the other without crossing any white lines. But, from point 1 to > point 2 is a B road so ways 1-A, A-B, and B-2 all have some ref, > say, B1234. > > Without the through_route relation, mkgmap assumes (erroneously) > that the through route is 1-2 because all of the ways in that route > have the ref B1234. > > By adding 2 through_route relations (one at A and the other at B), > mkgmap is informed of the real through route and will take that into > account when adjusting the turn headings. The end result is that the > quality of the routing directions is improved (we hope). > > In this example, we need to have 2 relations because the B road > joins/leaves the through route at two places. > > So if you know of any junctions that would benefit from this relation, > please add it to the map data and try this patch to see if it improves > the routing instructions. > > Mark > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] heed the through_route relation when adjusting turn headings
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] heed the through_route relation when adjusting turn headings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list