[mkgmap-dev] Continue behaviour changed?
From Mark Burton markb at ordern.com on Thu Feb 11 09:31:40 GMT 2010
Hi Steve, > Nothing will work 'as before' since it was kind of random what happened. > It should now work in the intended manner. Good! > If you can give me the tags on the way, other relevant lines in the > style, and the result you expect I can let you know if it is a bug or not. > > For a quick test, I get: > > WAY > highway=p > bridge=yes > ref=A1 > > <<<lines>>> > > highway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; > } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] > railway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; > } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] > highway=* & tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; > } [0x010e00 continue resolution 24] > > highway=p & bridge=yes [0x2] > > <<<results>>> > WAY 1: Line 0x10107, name=<null>, ref=<null>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2), > WAY 1: Line 0x2, name=<A1>, ref=<A1>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2), > > Which sounds like the result you were wanting, yes? Err, yes. Sheepishly, I have to admit that the problem was of my own devising. Thanks anyway for the useful response. Cheers, Mark
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Continue behaviour changed?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Gmapibuilder: Searching for new site to host source code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list