[mkgmap-dev] Recommended version?
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Wed Feb 17 22:27:50 GMT 2010
On 17.02.2010 21:42, WanMil wrote: >> Hi! >> >> According to the wiki, the last revision of mkgmap recommended as >> more-or-less stable is 1188. Which is rather ancient, of course. :-) >> >> As there have been quite some interesting changes recently, especially >> around multipolygons, I'd like to raise the question again: In your >> experience, is there a more current revision that you have used for major >> amounts of data without problems, so it could be recommended as reasonably >> stable, especially to new users? >> >> thanks >> >> Nop >> >> > Hi Nop, > > I think the answer is not so easy. From my point of view: use the latest > one (r1575). > > Question to all: Which issues must be fixed before releasing another > stable version? > > WanMil > Well maybe a better overview map? From seing other compilers it can't be that difficult to implement, but would be a huge speed improvement for mapsource (and be much better for GPS too, as basemap can kick in earlier). > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Recommended version?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Recommended version?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list