[mkgmap-dev] splitter and multipolygon
From Matteo Gottardi matgott at tin.it on Tue Mar 2 22:45:56 GMT 2010
In data martedì 02 marzo 2010 18:50:16, WanMil ha scritto: > Hi Matteo, > > what do you mean by "the result is incorrect"? Do you have some warnings > in the mkgmap logfile? You can see a screenshot of the correct and the wrong results here: http://www.gomatteo.net/without_splitter.jpg http://www.gomatteo.net/with_splitter.jpg The relation that cause problems is here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/417674 The log seem ok to me, you can find it at http://www.gomatteo.net/mkgmap.log I generated the map from a dump (italy.osm.bz2, downloaded from http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/italy.osm.bz2 ), using: bzcat italy.osm.bz2 | osmosis --read-xml enableDateParsing=no file=/dev/stdin --bounding-box top=47 left=10 bottom=45 right=13 --write-xml file=mappa.osm java -ea -Xmx3000m -jar splitter.jar --cache=cache --mixed mappa.osm java -Xmx3000M -jar mkgmap.jar -c teo_map -c template.args teo_map contains: add-pois-to-areas latin1 reduce-point-density=7 merge-lines style-file=/home/matteo/opt/gis/teo_style/ overview-mapname=teo series-name=teo tdbfile route If I process the output of osmosis (mappa.osm) without splitting, the result is correct. I'm using mkgmap svn 1593 and splitter r105. If I should do some other test, or put the wrong map online, just ask. Thank you, and please excuse my bad english :) -- * Matteo Gottardi | matgott at tin.it * ICQ UIN 20381372 * Linux - the choice of a GNU generation * GPG Fingerprint: * B9EE 108F 52C8 D50C B667 B1F2 AB56 8A01 BA3D 36A1
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter and multipolygon
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter and multipolygon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list