[mkgmap-dev] Why are all the un-named peaks called '6140565'?
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Mon Mar 15 15:58:48 GMT 2010
Hi Mark >> It may be a clue that nat_ref does not occur in the style file at all. >> As far as I can tell so far, the problem is happening after style >> processing. Very strange. > > In StyledConverter.elementSetup() if an element doesn't have a name but > it has a ref (ref|int_ref|nat_ref|etc.) the first ref gets assigned to Yes, I was thinking that the fact that nat_ref was involved meant that it couldn't be anything much to do with ValueBuilder et al. It turns out that the problem is Labels that are empty but not null. All such labels, however generated, show as whatever label was defined right after the first empty one. The attached patch should fix it. ..Steve -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: empty_labels.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 463 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20100315/13134fc1/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Why are all the un-named peaks called '6140565'?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Why are all the un-named peaks called '6140565'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list