[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] Advanced restrictions
From Marko Mäkelä marko.makela at iki.fi on Sun May 16 07:08:22 BST 2010
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul wrote: > >> What are via ways in restrictions? Could you give some practical example >> of what they do and what they are needed for? >> >> Would they increase the maximal routing distance? Or maybe it the fact >> that they are missing the reason for our intertilerouting in Mapsource >> which is not working correctly? >> >> >This is something I brought up a while ago. Consider the following > > > > >A B C >--------+-------> > | ><-------+-------- >D E| F > | > \/ > G >ABC is oneway in direction ABC >FED is oneway in direction FED >BE is twoway but is marked with direction BE >U turns are not allowed for FEBC nor are they allowed for ABED but all other turn are allowed > >In this situation the "via way" is BE and you create a no_u_turn trstriction from FE, to BC, via BE. Up until now mkgmap would ignore this restriction as it couldn't handle it. > >There are loads of these near me and I suspect in many other places as well Sure, every place where there is a major road that is mapped as two antiparallel oneways. Usually U turns and across-the-ongoing-traffic turns would be prohibited, and the 'via' would be a two-node way, not a node. Marko
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] Advanced restrictions
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] Advanced restrictions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list