[mkgmap-dev] Really Serious bug when not using --route
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Mon May 31 14:09:20 BST 2010
On 31.05.2010 15:05, Steve Ratcliffe wrote: > Hi > > >> A possible way to find the flag: >> With MapSource (at least with 6.13) it is possible to include or exclude >> the routing data when transferring to the device. If you transfer the >> same data twice, one time with, the ther time without the routing data, >> > A great idea! > > Unfortunately my results are that all the sub-files are unaltered > and bit for bit identical in the two cases. > > All the changes in the header appear to be consistent with the changes > required for the fact that the files are different sizes and one > does not contain NOD. > > I've had no luck with finding anything. I've tried unsetting all the > flags that we don't know the meaning of, so it seems that it might > not be a simple flag that we always set but shouldn't. > > Perhaps mixing routable and non-routeable maps with the same family id > just doesn't work? Has anyone seen a working example? > Yes I mixed the Garmin Topo Austria v1 (non routable) with mkgmap routable maps, and the errors did not occur. The flag is properly really well hidden. I think mkgmap should simply default to always write the NOD index file, also if --route is not given. That's not the best solution, but better than breaking down new GPS (and all Oregon/Dakota/Colorado have now beta Firmware that is probably prone to crash with non routable mkgmap created maps). > ..Steve > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Really Serious bug when not using --route
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Really Serious bug when not using --route
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list