[mkgmap-dev] Bicycle routing improvements (reverting breakage from r1431)
From Carlos Dávila cdavilam at orangecorreo.es on Tue Aug 10 16:12:43 BST 2010
El 10/08/10 15:12, Marko Mäkelä escribió: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Valentijn Sessink wrote: > >> Marko Mäkelä schreef: >> >>> I am planning to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from >>> highway=trunk and to restore non-bicycle paths to road_speed=0. >>> >> I'd suggest you don't. I do not know why bicycle routing differs. >> Adding random patches to my random reports won't help. >> > It is not totally random. Someone just yelled that defaulting bicycle=no > on highway=trunk is not right, and I cannot disagree with that. If there > is no traffic sign that prohibits bicycles and pedestrians, then they > are allowed. And I haven't seen such traffic signs in Finland, except in > some places when there is a cycleway next to the highway=trunk. Just to add information from some other place, in Spain trunk roads are allowed for bicycles and pedestrians; only motorways are forbidden for them. So +1 to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from me too.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Bicycle routing improvements (reverting breakage from r1431)
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Bicycle routing improvements (reverting breakage from r1431)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list