[mkgmap-dev] Some bounderies shown as river
From Josef Latt Josef.Latt at gmx.net on Fri Oct 8 06:37:37 BST 2010
Am 07.10.2010 21:37, schrieb Torsten Leistikow: > Josef Latt schrieb am 07.10.2010 20:03: >> That means that a tagging like this is false? > ... > >> <tag k="boundary" v="administrative"/> > ... > >> <tag k="waterway" v="river"/> > > If the river itself is the boundary, then this tagging is ok. > > But in such a case, you can't complain, that the boundary is shown as a river, > because the displayed element is a river as well as a boundary. So it is just a > matter of display priority. > >>From your screenshot I can now guess, what you mean: There are also other ways > in the map, which are dislpayed as river, although they are only tagged as > boundary AND NOT as river at the same time? > > If this is the case, I would guess, that the complete boundary is made up out of > a multipolygon. > > In this case the multipolygon tagging seems to be faulty. Either all outer ways > must be tagged the same (this can not be, since one part is tagged as a river, > while other parts shouldn't be rivers), or the tag values for the multipolygon > must be placed on the relation instead of the outer ways (this is also not done > in the example, since the boundary tag is on the way and not on the relation). That is to high for me, as I'm relativ new in tagging. But I can't see any difference to other boundaries with IMHO same tagging. E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2275&lon=7.4450&zoom=15. It's rel_546624. Greetings Josef
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Some bounderies shown as river
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Some bounderies shown as river
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list