[mkgmap-dev] Some bounderies shown as river
From Josef Latt Josef.Latt at gmx.net on Fri Oct 8 18:04:29 BST 2010
The posted links work only in merkaartor, as I noticed afterwards. I use merkaartor at 99.9 %. Sorry Am 08.10.2010 16:23, schrieb Josef Latt: > I forgot to list again the old ones: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2509&lon=7.4284&zoom=12 > -> Gemeinde Hatzenport rel_546634 > -> Gemeinde Löf rel_546642 > -> Gemeinde Lehmen rel_546640 > > > Am 08.10.2010 16:07, schrieb Josef Latt: >> Other boundaries shown as river: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.7548&lon=7.3343&zoom=12 >> -> Relation 'Hennef (Sieg) rel_36042' >> >> Greetings >> Josef >> >> Am 08.10.2010 07:37, schrieb Josef Latt: >>> >>> >>> Am 07.10.2010 21:37, schrieb Torsten Leistikow: >>>> Josef Latt schrieb am 07.10.2010 20:03: >>>>> That means that a tagging like this is false? >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> <tag k="boundary" v="administrative"/> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> <tag k="waterway" v="river"/> >>>> >>>> If the river itself is the boundary, then this tagging is ok. >>>> >>>> But in such a case, you can't complain, that the boundary is shown as a river, >>>> because the displayed element is a river as well as a boundary. So it is just a >>>> matter of display priority. >>>> >>>> >From your screenshot I can now guess, what you mean: There are also other ways >>>> in the map, which are dislpayed as river, although they are only tagged as >>>> boundary AND NOT as river at the same time? >>>> >>>> If this is the case, I would guess, that the complete boundary is made up out of >>>> a multipolygon. >>>> >>>> In this case the multipolygon tagging seems to be faulty. Either all outer ways >>>> must be tagged the same (this can not be, since one part is tagged as a river, >>>> while other parts shouldn't be rivers), or the tag values for the multipolygon >>>> must be placed on the relation instead of the outer ways (this is also not done >>>> in the example, since the boundary tag is on the way and not on the relation). >>> >>> That is to high for me, as I'm relativ new in tagging. >>> But I can't see any difference to other boundaries with IMHO same >>> tagging. E.g. >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2275&lon=7.4450&zoom=15. It's >>> rel_546624. >>> >>> Greetings >>> Josef >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Some bounderies shown as river
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1710: Better fix for the >= and <= operators.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list