[mkgmap-dev] Missing ways part 2

Tue Oct 19 08:51:59 BST 2010


Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> 
> Last time I was bicycling/mapping there, I got confused, because I 
> thought that there would be a connection between the highway=residential 
> (Kaskelanpolku) and the highway=secondary (Lahdentie). Of course, the 
> tunnel would not be considered for routing, because the ways share no 
> nodes, but the ways seemed to be connected on the map display.
> 

Hi,
maybe this rules before your highway-rules in lines-file would solve your
problem:

bridge=yes | bridge=true [0x28 resolution 21 continue]
tunnel=yes | tunnel=true [0x27 resolution 21 continue]

aighes
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Missing-ways-part-2-tp5647895p5649892.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.