[mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
From Marko Mäkelä marko.makela at iki.fi on Tue Oct 19 20:28:21 BST 2010
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:58:26PM +0200, Carlos Dávila wrote: >Today geofabrik is offering corrupt excerpts, so I can't >make further tests by now. Today geofabrik is only offering *.osm.pbf files, no *.osm.bz2 files. Do you have any suggestion how to implement the following with the PBF format: bzip2 -dc "$OSM_BZ2"| perl -e \ 'my $del=0; while(<>){ $del=1 if (/<relation.* version="1".* user="usm78-gis"/); s/(<node id="28954644".*lat=)"60\.51564"/$1"59.326172"/; s/(<node id="29193143".*lon=)"24\.12826"/$1"19.072266"/; print unless $del; $del=0 if m|</relation>|; }'| tee "$OSM"| $JAVACMD $JAVACMD_OPTIONS -jar splitter.jar --split-file=areas.list Above, I remove some multipolygons in Russia (mostly broken ones) and move two coastline endpoints for generate-sea. That is done before splitting the map extract. I guess I could do this within the tiles, but it would get a little tricky. I guess I might want to preserve the *.osm format, or I would want mkgmap to produce multiple map sets from one parsing run. It seems that running mkgmap --style=routes on finland.osm.pbf is several times slower than running it on finland.osm. Marko
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list