[mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Wed Oct 20 11:22:13 BST 2010
On 20/10/10 11:04, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > Are the .osm.bz2 and .osm.pbf files identical to begin with? Today, > Geofabrik offers files with quite different timestamps: > > portugal.osm.bz2 20-Oct-2010 00:20 13M > portugal.osm.pbf 20-Oct-2010 07:17 7.1M I can't speak for the equivalence of the geofabrik extracts, but for my recent test I downloaded the pbf and used osmosis to convert between the formats. You can use: osmosis --read-pbf foo.osm.pbf --write-xml foo.osm.gz osmosis --read-xml foo.osm.gz --write-pbf foo.osm.pbf I also do not doubt that the produced maps contain the same elements, its just that they are in a different order depending on the input file. Since my previous message I have discovered one reason why this might be so, but there is still more reasons to be found. > Is there a tool that converts .osm.bz2 and .osm.pbf to a canonical > format? If there is, then you could compare the canonical formats to see > if the files are truly equivalent. > > Marko
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Different routing results using osm vs osm.pbf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list