[mkgmap-dev] Missing ways part 1
From Scott Crosby scrosby at cs.rice.edu on Fri Oct 22 20:09:09 BST 2010
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Adrian <ar2988-os at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Marko wrote: > > If I remember previous discussions correctly, splitter does not split > > lines exactly at the tile border, but instead it includes all nodes > > that are not too much outside the tile. > > That is also what I understood. Splitter includes in each tile, the > nodes that fall within the tile, and also the nodes in an overlap region > around the tile. The width of the overlap can be set with --overlap. > > > An almost-straight long way can be drawn with few nodes. You could > > help the situation by adding a point to the line close to the > > splitting border. > > I would expect it to cause a problem, if a particular way does not have > a node in the overlap region. The difficulty with your fix is that it > would only work for me (and only if I use the same areas.list each > time); it will not work for other users. Also, it will not work for me > in the long term, because data is continuously added to OSM, so the > tiles need to be made smaller as time goes on. > If the overlap region is always bigger than the largest internode spacing between two nodes in a way, then this shouldn't be a problem. Decide a distance, say, 20km, and then set the overlap to be that distance. Finding and fixing ways that violate the rule can be done by a bot. As a workaround, until the mkgmap problem is diagnosed, increase the overlap. Check out the crosby_integration splitter branch. It can correctly handle large overlaps. Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20101022/8538b489/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Missing ways part 1
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Missing ways part 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list