[mkgmap-dev] Distinguishing cycleways from footways and minor paths
From Marko Mäkelä marko.makela at iki.fi on Thu Feb 3 11:29:52 GMT 2011
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:59:14AM +0100, Minko wrote: >Advantage of the mapnik.typ is that it looks like the 'default' osm map. I think that I would find Mapnik too low contrast on the small screen. The paleness is useful for overlays, such as www.latukartta.fi (Nordic skiing tracks overlayed on SlippyMap tiles). >Have you got an example of another Typ file that looks good on the >older units? No. Until there are open source tools for creating TYP files, I try to avoid depending on them. >0x0d on a nuvi and a Dakota: without a typ file they are thin white >lines with "line" as label. On a white/grey background almost >invisible. :-( On a nuvi 0x16 are thin grey lines. On a Dakota it's a >thicker, grey dashed line, same as unpaved roads. On QLandkarteGT, 0xd..0x14 are totally invisible. This confirms that it would not be wise to use them without a TYP file. I think that the default style must be useable without a TYP file. A TYP file can of course enhance the experience, so to say. :-) I got another idea: promote cycleways to 0x07 (alley), currently used by highway=service. On the Edge 705 it looks identical (brown dashed line) to 0x16, but the default label (shown in navigation instructions and when hovering the cursor over a way) would distinguish cycleways from footways and paths. QLandkarteGT distinguishes these by colour: 0x07 is a brown solid line and 0x16 is gray. Other devices than the Edge 705 might distinguish these too. What do you think about the attached patch that moves highway=pedestrian from 0x06 to 0x16 and highway=cycleway and some bicycle=designated ways from 0x16 to 0x07? 0x07 was previously only used by highway=service and similar. If I get no objections in a few days, I will commit this. Marko -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cycleway.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 2878 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20110203/7bfb5e05/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Changing styles and TYP integrating
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Distinguishing cycleways from footways and minor paths
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list