[mkgmap-dev] New locator branch
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Fri Mar 18 13:45:57 GMT 2011
Yes, we provide the same option for coastlines. So it's possible although there is the size restriction. Boundaries take around 3% of the complete OSM data (3% as osm.gz compared to osm.pbf). So think about creating a europe map from the 4.5 GB dump. The boundary data file would be around 3%*4.5GB(osm.pbf) = 135MB(osm.gz). So in the end your computer additionally needs as much main memory as you need to compile a 135MB big tile. The calculation is quite rough but the result is clear: the memory requirements grow quite much compared to the overall size of your map. WanMil > Stupid question... > Why don't extract the boundaries with osmosis to a single file. > mkgmap could use this file to complete the boundaries while rendering the maps... > > Martin > > Am 17.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb WanMil: > >> >>> >>>> And another requirement is also hard to achieve: performance. The branch >>>> is not optimized very well yet. But I am sure that such searches for big >>>> areas from all items of a tile are quite expensive no matter how >>>> optimized they are. >>>> >>>> WanMil >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> I currently really don't want to use the locator branch, due to it's >>> speed. I need already about 12 hours to compute all maps for weekly >>> updates and osm data alone growing is already a concern. Wouldn't it be >>> enough to use no guessing and just input correct addresses (best with >>> working housenumber search)? The searching for streets not addresses is >>> anyhow kinda strange and seems much more like a workaround than a clean >>> solution. >> >> Yes ... but how should mkgmap input the correct addresses? ;-) >> In an ideal world you are right. But OSM data is far (very far) away >> from complete address tagging. >> >> Beware that all POIs would have to contain a complete set of addr-tags >> (addr:country, addr:county addr:region(?), addr:city, addr:street, >> addr:housenumber). The same with the is_in tags for all streets that do >> not have any POIs attached until now. I havn't tested it but it should >> not be too complicated to make a statistic with osmosis and a dump file. >> >> Maybe the completeness of tagging will change within the next 2 years >> but we are implementing for now. >> >> WanMil
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] New locator branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] New locator branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list