[mkgmap-dev] Sensible resolutions - (or patch 5)
From Marko Mäkelä marko.makela at iki.fi on Fri Mar 25 17:11:05 GMT 2011
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Felix Hartmann wrote: >>I did not test adding the levels 19 and 21 yet. Bad news: Adding just one level would blow up some limit. My largest tile .img is about 20 megabytes. Time to split my tiles again, I guess. >you may lower secondary_link and tertiary_link to resolution 21, but I >would not lower tertiary to 21. It is best at 20 as otherwise >incomplete "networks" happen. Well, broken networks are a matter of fact for bicycling already. In bicycling, I favor highway=residential and highway=path, and they won't be visible at useful zoom levels. But I got your point; I will only lower the links. I guess I could lower primary_link and trunk_link too. The link roads are not that long anyway. Marko
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Sensible resolutions - (or patch 5)
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Sensible resolutions - (or patch 5)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list