logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Multipolygon/boundary relations and subrelations

From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Mon Jul 11 12:14:15 BST 2011

I vote for repairing it. I have read the multipolygon and boundary wiki 
pages again and again and think that they don't allow using the 
boundary-segment relations to compose the complete boundary relation.

Anyhow mapnik does not support using boundary segments and that's a good 
explanation why reverting the edit of Loll78 
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8535622).

WanMil

> It appears someone (I can't find out who) likes the boundary_segments a
> lot. The three boundary_segments of Luxembourg now make up the
> Luxembourg border. That's in my opinion inconsistent with map_features
> and with the tagging of all other European countries. Personally I
> dislike boundary_segments: logically I understand it, although - also
> logically-  it should also be used on continents, regions, cities
> etcetera which would be uncontrollable
>
> If nobody opposes I'll repair the Luxembourg border relation somewhere
> wednesday evening
>
> Cheers, Johan
>
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:56:24 +0200, WanMil wrote:
>> Today I observed that the boundary relation of Luxembourg was changed
>> in
>> a way that it does not contain the boundary ways itself but links to
>> other relations that contain parts of the boundary
>> (Luxembourg/Belgium;
>> Luxembourg/Netherlands etc.).
>>
>> I am not sure if that's an accepted scheme for mps/boundaries.
>> Does anyone know if that's correct and accepted?
>> Should mkgmap support this?
>>
>> WanMil
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>




More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list