[mkgmap-dev] Multipolygon/boundary relations and subrelations
From navmaps navmaps at navmaps.eu on Wed Jul 13 19:28:58 BST 2011
Loll78 responded to my mail: "As you already mentioned in the forum, I have used the boundary_segment because this (new) proposed relations seams to me as a good thing because it simplifies the edition of boundaries, especially the large ones (i.e. of countries) a lot. But I know too it will be also be inconsiquent if one does not used that scheme for every boundary. I think a compilation software should handle both schemes. The same as the compiler can also handles the different boundary schemes of i.e. Germany (type=multipolygon) and i.e. France (type=boundary). Anyway, after rereading the proposed relation type, it is not clear to me, if several boundary_segments forming a closed area have the same effect as the the entire individual ways in a normal relation." Although I still think this option is not good because Luxembourg is a simple closed border (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary : For not closed, linear border, see Proposal:Relation boundary segment) I didn't want to revert Loll78's changeset. I used a dual option: I created a new boundary relation for Luxembourg in the style which is being used for all other European/worldwide countries. My changeset: 8715072, new relation number for the Luxembourg border: 1662399. Cheers, Johan On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:04:22 +0200, navmaps wrote: > I've send Loll78 a message to check into this discussion, let's hope > he > responds. It has to do with a proposed relation change which seems to > be > intended to be applied to the France border. Luckily that border > hasn't > changed yet. Take a look at > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/boundary_segment > > Cheers, Johan > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:14:15 +0200, WanMil wrote: >> I vote for repairing it. I have read the multipolygon and boundary >> wiki >> pages again and again and think that they don't allow using the >> boundary-segment relations to compose the complete boundary >> relation. >> >> Anyhow mapnik does not support using boundary segments and that's a >> good >> explanation why reverting the edit of Loll78 >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8535622). >> >> WanMil >> >>> It appears someone (I can't find out who) likes the >>> boundary_segments a >>> lot. The three boundary_segments of Luxembourg now make up the >>> Luxembourg border. That's in my opinion inconsistent with >>> map_features >>> and with the tagging of all other European countries. Personally I >>> dislike boundary_segments: logically I understand it, although - >>> also >>> logically- it should also be used on continents, regions, cities >>> etcetera which would be uncontrollable >>> >>> If nobody opposes I'll repair the Luxembourg border relation >>> somewhere >>> wednesday evening >>> >>> Cheers, Johan >>> >>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:56:24 +0200, WanMil wrote: >>>> Today I observed that the boundary relation of Luxembourg was >>>> changed >>>> in >>>> a way that it does not contain the boundary ways itself but links >>>> to >>>> other relations that contain parts of the boundary >>>> (Luxembourg/Belgium; >>>> Luxembourg/Netherlands etc.). >>>> >>>> I am not sure if that's an accepted scheme for mps/boundaries. >>>> Does anyone know if that's correct and accepted? >>>> Should mkgmap support this? >>>> >>>> WanMil >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Multipolygon/boundary relations and subrelations
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Index and equally named cities
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list