[mkgmap-dev] Resolution/level range, rendering parallel routes
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Thu Jul 21 11:15:36 BST 2011
On 19/07/11 18:46, Jiri Klement wrote: > Hi, > > [1] says that resolution or level range is not supported but in fact > it works (tested on gpsmap 62s). It only needs to be written in > opposite order (ie 3-1 instead of 1-3). Can you please change it so it > works in both ways? It's really a minor issue but it should make it a > bit easier for beginners :-) Thanks for reporting this. In my testing however it seems that level works as expected, but resolution does not. level 1-3 Works resolution 18-20 No resolution 20-18 'Works' Attached patch fixes the problem that I see. Could you double-check and if it really is level that doesn't work for you, can you provide some kind of example? Thanks ..Steve -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fix_for_resolution.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 4152 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20110721/fd4b16d3/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Resolution/level range, rendering parallel routes
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Splitting srtm.osm fails
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list