[mkgmap-dev] [TeamCity, FAILED] Build mkgmap::trunk build #2008-1069
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Tue Jul 26 19:46:32 BST 2011
My assumption is correct: The difference in the LBL file size is caused by the fact the default country name is no longer added if it is not used. I could change the tests so that the expected LBL file sizes are corrected. But before I do this: Does anybody expect any problem if a map does not contain any country? Why? WanMil > Merging of the locator branch creates a problem with two test cases. > > This might be ok, because the tests just check the size of the LBL file > for a well known input. Maybe the change that the default country and > default region name is added to the LBL file only if it is really used > has triggered a change in the LBL file size. > > I'll have to check that in detail. But now it's time to go to bed... > > WanMil > > >> Build /mkgmap::trunk build #2008-1069 >> <http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?buildId=3622&buildTypeId=bt2>/ >> failed (tests failed: 2 (2 new), passed: 184) >> Agent: Iocaste >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Changes included (1 change >> <http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?tab=buildChangesDiv&buildId=3622&buildTypeId=bt2>). >> >> Change 2008 by wanmil (78 files >> <http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewModification.html?modId=1279&personal=false&tab=vcsModificationFiles>): >> /Improve assignment of city, zip code, region and country information >> for address search. It is now possible to use the OSM boundary >> information to assign the location fields city, zip code, region and >> country. This is the merge of the locator branch so see that for more >> detailed info./ >> >> Failed Tests Summary: 2 (2 new) >> *(new) *func.SimpleTest.testPolish details »<#225> >> *(new) *func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize details »<#287> >> >> Stacktraces : >> *(new) *func.SimpleTest.testPolish >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: LBL size expected:<969> but >> was:<957> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) at >> org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) at >> org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) at >> org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) at >> func.SimpleTest.testPolish(SimpleTest.java:111) at >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) >> at >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) >> at >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) >> at >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) at >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) at >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) at >> junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39) at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:422) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:931) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:785) >> >> >> >> *(new) *func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: LBL size expected:<27657> but >> was:<27645> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) at >> org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) at >> org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) at >> org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) at >> func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize(SimpleRouteTest.java:63) at >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) >> at >> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) >> at >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) >> at >> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) at >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) at >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) at >> junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39) at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:422) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:931) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:785) >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Configure >> <http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/profile.html?init=1&tab=userNotifications> your >> email notifications on your settings page. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [TeamCity, FAILED] Build mkgmap::trunk build #2008-1069
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Map installation problem from r1971 onward
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list