[mkgmap-dev] Coastline issues - analysis and possible solution
From Bartosz Fabianowski bartosz at fabianowski.eu on Mon Aug 29 08:40:44 BST 2011
> fixed tiles may produce better coastlines, but you'll get "map too big" > at some point as the map grows. The way I understand Marko's suggestion, you would give the splitter an initial list of tiles (or just a region) and it would then subdivide that into smaller tiles as it does today. The difference would be that you could provide the splitter with a large dataset (say all of Europe) while telling it to cut out tiles for a small region (say the Netherlands) only. This would essentially integrate the osmosis cutting step into the splitter. The advantage of this is that the splitter has data for the tiles it cuts out, including ones that expand when rounding. The disadvantages are a need to push around larger datasets, to need to specify tile boundaries each time the splitter is invoked and a loss of the UNIX principle that each tool handles one small thing and handles it well. - Bartosz
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Coastline issues - analysis and possible solution
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Coastline issues - analysis and possible solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list