[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] LocationHook speedup
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Sat Dec 31 11:43:13 GMT 2011
> Hello WanMil, > > > WanMil wrote >> >> The reason is that the boundaries are not complete. Complete in two >> meanings: >> 1. Some boundaries are missing due to incomplete OSM data >> 2. In some areas there might be a boundary with admin_level=7, other >> areas do not have that admin_level. The LocationHook cannot know about >> that and therefore it can remove elements only if they contain all >> remaining tags. >> > > ahh, incomplete data always makes things that much more complicated :-( > > I also just got to that admin_level=7. In "Saarland", one of my test cases, admin_level=7 just an example. admin_levels are used differently in countries and in regions etc. > I see > "Verbandsgemeinde Waldmohr" > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/897709 > which is the only boundary that has admin_level=7. The interesting thing is: > the returned result-list for this boundary is always empty. So, maybe there > is a cheaper way to detect this first or does it means that there is a bug > in quadtree or the selection of the boundaries? Sounds more like a bug! But it's also possible that the higher admin_levels (8,9,10,11) references all other admin_levels and therefore there all elements of Waldmohr have been removed before querying for it. WanMil > > Gerd > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-LocationHook-speedup-tp7135704p7140096.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] LocationHook speedup
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] LocationHook speedup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list