[mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds

Wed Jan 25 08:04:37 GMT 2012

Hi Thorsten,

I agree, it should be switched. 
One correction: LocationHook may add the tag mkgmap:postcode, not mkgmap:postal_code. 

ciao,
Gerd

> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:57:37 +0100
> From: kukuk at suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, but that shouldn't matter in the LocationHook. The LocationHook just adds tags like mkgmap:postal_code to the nodes that form such a building, and I guess that persons who are interested in postal codes 
> > will use coresponding lines in their styles to analyse mkgmnap:postal_code AND e.g. addr:postcode.
> > Right?
> 
> I think yes ;) At least most styles have:
> 
> mkgmap:postal_code!=* & mkgmap:postcode=* { set mkgmap:postal_code='${mkgmap:postcode}' }
> mkgmap:postal_code!=* & addr:postcode=* { set mkgmap:postal_code='${addr:postcode}' }
> 
> The only question is: should we assume mkgmap:postcode is more
> correct than addr:postcode? I think the order should be switched
> in the default style.
> 
>   Thorsten
> 
> -- 
> Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20120125/653f416f/attachment.html 