[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH V2] boundary preparer with quadtree
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Mon Feb 6 22:11:27 GMT 2012
Hi Gerd, I need some time to look through your patch. But after a first short look through I wonder if you tried to handle the balancing act between keeping the old bnd format and saving your quadtree in an apropriate way. Using the boundary lister I think have seen that you save each boundary but no merged boundary? I see you are saving admin_level=2 and additionally admin_level=4 and admin_level=6 etc. I expected that one of your improvements is that you are doing the complete merge step during preparation so that you save one area (or boundary) with all infos of admin_level=2,4 and 6. Your new mkgmap:boundaryid format mixes multiple information in one tag. I think it is better to use the mkgmap:boundaryid for the id only and one or more additional tags for your quadtree information. That's just my first impression. I think your idea is exactly right to move the merge step to the preparer. I am not 100% sure if it is necessary to save the quadtree node infos. But I am sure you have compared the performance :-) WanMil > Hi, > > attached is the patch that works on linux systems, no functional change to > v1. > > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5459686/boundary_prep_quadtree_v2.patch > boundary_prep_quadtree_v2.patch > > Gerd > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-V2-boundary-preparer-with-quadtree-tp5459686p5459686.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH V2] boundary preparer with quadtree
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH V2] boundary preparer with quadtree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list