[mkgmap-dev] [Patch v6] LocationHook with new Quadtree

Tue Feb 21 09:04:59 GMT 2012

Hi WanMil,

yes, I would prefer that you do it so that I can learn how it works.
I found so many different ways to implement multi threading in Java (and we
use many different ways in splitter and mkgmap). I simply have no idea which
one is the best for our purposes. 

Gerd

WanMil wrote
> 
>> Hi WanMil,
>>
>> attached patch corrects the known problems, it removes some debug or dead
>> code and starts to complete javadoc.
>>
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5499705/boundary_prep_quadtree_v6.patch
>> boundary_prep_quadtree_v6.patch
>>
>> I did not yet fully understand the concept of the FutureTask, so I didn't
>> dare to change BoundaryPreparer.
>> I got the impression that this will require a lot more code in main,
>> because
>> we have to finish all preparer threads first.
> 
> I can have a look on it. It should not be a big deal but we can also 
> change that at a later step.
> 
> WanMil
> 
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v6-LocationHook-with-new-Quadtree-tp5499705p5499705.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at .org
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v6-LocationHook-with-new-Quadtree-tp5499705p5501636.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.