[mkgmap-dev] Merging back the performance branch
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Mar 4 16:36:56 GMT 2012
Hi WanMil, > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 17:18:41 +0100 > From: wmgcnfg at web.de > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Merging back the performance branch > > > Hi WanMil, > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:28:12 +0100 > > > From: wmgcnfg at web.de > > > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Merging back the performance branch > > > > > > Hi Gerd, > > > > > > in your opinion what is the current status of the performance branch? > > > There seem to be no more fundamental changes so I would like to focus on > > > merging it back to the trunk. Additional improvements can then be > > > applied to the trunk. > > > > well, r2234 doesn't contain all patches that I've posted. Do you plan to > > add them? > > Of course, but I want to have a look on the patches before commiting them. okay, take your time. > > > > > My latest version contains another big change regarding Tags and > > StyledConverter. > > I'd like to change the Rule evaluation in a way that it will allow to > > skip many rules > > that are now partly evaluated. > > Up to now my changes are saving maybe 5% - 10 %, but I hope to see more. > > I don't think that this will be done soon. > > We can merge back the performance branch and continue using it for the > style changes. fine > > > > > I have an idea how splitArea() could be changed to be much faster, but > > no algorithm > > yet. I believe that we don't need any Area.intersect() calculations for > > that, we > > just have to split a few lines. > > That's great. > Maybe you can invest your time better in other points of mkgmap with a > greater improvement. Performance improvements are great but there are > some functional problems unsolved, e.g. the Subdivision creation in > mkgmap has some problems which need to be addressed. I'd like to do that if I had an idea what it means. I am not yet familiar with the whole code. So, what I need to correct errors is a very precise description like "with the steps 1) ... 2) ... 3) .. I get a result abc, and I'm missing blabla in it" > > > > > > > > > The performance improvements are great. Before merging back I would like > > > to invite people (and give them the chance) to test it carefully. For > > > this I will upload the complete world bounds so that anyone can > > participate. > > > > good. I can't believe that so many changes do not contain any bugs:-) > > > > > > > > From my point of view the following things must be done before merging > > > back: > > > * Remove several System.out printouts. Please use the mkgmap internal > > > logging system. > > > * One note to the logging system: Instead of using > > > log.info("There were "+n+" results") > > > better use > > > log.info("There were", n, "results") > > > This avoids string creation in case the log message is not logged. > > > > okay, I will change that > > > > > * Please check the code with FindBugs or something similar > > > > okay, I wasn't aware that this tool is for free :-) > > > > > * Is the source code well documented? > > > > hard to say. I tend to comment only those lines that implement > > a tricky solution. Everything else should be self-documenting. > > > > > * Is the licence header added to all classes? > > What would the right one? > > I don't know if there is a 'correct' one but I am using the following: > /* > * Copyright (C) 2006, 2012. > * > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or > * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > * > * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but > * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > * General Public License for more details. > */ > Okay, so I'll use that one as well. Gerd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20120304/595d29cf/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Merging back the performance branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Merging back the performance branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list