[mkgmap-dev] [Patch] Overflow in splitter node counters --- Patch not working at all for me.

Wed Apr 4 16:56:15 BST 2012

Hi Felix,

no problem. It is easy to verify the result of the new splitter, you can
simply compare 
the output files, for "normal" data you should see no difference to r200.

Gerd

Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> 
> ups, well I had checked for that. But somehow I had a tree conflict 
> regarding external.properties file (which should exist anymore) and 
> therefore wrong locations where it looked for the osmpbf.jar which 
> didn't exist anymore.
> I'll write again once I can confirm whether the outcome is correctly 
> working - but that will need some time as the data amount is huge....
> 
> On 04.04.2012 16:48, GerdP wrote:
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> I see those error messages when osmpbf.jar is missing. Do you try this in
>> a
>> different directory?
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>
>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> It's splitting the big data now, but for me all output is broken (even
>>> for files were the old splitter worked fine without probs):
>>>
>>>
>>> Error at line 1, col 1
>>> Bad file format: 75400000.osm.pbf
>>> Error parsing file
>>> ........
>>> Error at line 1, col 1
>>> Bad file format: 75400698.osm.pbf
>>> Error parsing file
>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>           at
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.FileInfo.getFileInfo(FileInfo.java:139)
>>>           at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:406)
>>>           at
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:126)
>>>           at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:112)
>>> openSUSE-121-64-minimal:/home/contourlines #
>>>
>>>
>>> This also happens to srtm files. Have not tried standard osm.pbf
>>> extracts...
>>>
>>> On 02.04.2012 10:35, GerdP wrote:
>>>> Hi Thorsten,
>>>>
>>>> attached is a patch for the problem reported here:
>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bug-in-splitter-tp5610856p5610856.html
>>>>
>>>> I don't have the data nor the machine to test it, so I tried to find
>>>> all
>>>> places were nodes are counted and changed the variables to long.
>>>>
>>>> I did not find a good explanation for the small difference in the
>>>> numbers:
>>>> osmconvert reported 2518069911 nodes, which is
>>>>    ~ 2.518.069.911 -(2^31 - 1) = 370.586.264
>>>> - 2^31 + 370.586.264 =* -1.776.897.384*
>>>> but splitter r200 reported * -1.776.905.107* nodes
>>>> The formatting routine is not the reason. Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Gerd
>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5611808/nodes_int_overflow_v1.patch
>>>> nodes_int_overflow_v1.patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in
>>>> context:http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-Overflow-in-splitter-node-counters-tp5611808p5611808.html
>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-Overflow-in-splitter-node-counters-tp5611808p5617985.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at .org
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-Overflow-in-splitter-node-counters-tp5611808p5618181.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.