[mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage

Sat Apr 7 13:28:51 BST 2012

Hi Gerd,

can you please post again the identical output patch? I cannot find it 
on my computer and the patch referenced by nabble cannot be found 
(http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2011q4/013223.html).

Thanks!
WanMil

> Hi WanMil,
>
> I've tried again.
> Reg. the performance improvements I see only small differences, I guess
> that's because I use
> splitter with default overlap of 2000. I assume the greater the overlap the
> greater is the
> improvement of the UnusedElementsRemoverHook ?
>
> reg. different result:
> I've uploaded the tile (sorry, it is very big):
> http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/65/63240022.osm.pbf
> I can reproduce the problem with trunk (r2263) (and my
> identical_output.patch) using the following parms:
> java -Xmx1600m -Xms1600m -jar mkgmap.jar --remove-short-arcs --route
> --preserve-element-order 63240022.osm.pbf
>
> If I comment the call of UnusedElementsRemoverHook I get a different output
> file.
> I hope you can reproduce it?
>
> Gerd
>
>
>
> WanMil wrote
>>
>>>
>>> Please, can you review if the UnusedElementsRemoverHook is still useful?
>>> With my test data, it is slowing down mkgmap a little bit and I also see
>>> a different result for one tile in the UK when I disable it.
>>>
>>> Gerd
>>>
>>
>> Gerd,
>>
>> I cannot reproduce that the UnusedElementsRemoverHook does not improve
>> the speed of mkgmap. Can you please try again?
>>
>> If you see a different result it should be analysed. So please post your
>> tile and your mkgmap parameters and all the details so that I can check
>> that.
>>
>> WanMil
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5622393.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev