[mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage

Mon Apr 9 21:00:34 BST 2012

Hi Gerd,

yes I think that should be possible.
AFAIK in method end() of class StyledConverter the first lines

Collection<List<RestrictionRelation>> lists = restrictions.values();
for (List<RestrictionRelation> l : lists) {
	for (RestrictionRelation rr : l) {
		rr.addRestriction(collector);
	}
}

must be changed in such a way that it is processed in a definite order.

WanMil

> Hi WanMil,
>
> okay, so let's assume the hook is working as it should.
> Do you see a simple way to change the identical_output.patch so that the
> turn restrictions are processed in a fixed order?
>
> Gerd
>
>  > Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:51:45 +0200
>  > From: wmgcnfg at web.de
>  > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>  > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage
>  >
>  > Hi Gerd,
>  >
>  > I see a difference in the turn restrictions. It seems that they are not
>  > added in sorted order.
>  >
>  > I've printed out all elements passing the style converter. When printing
>  > out the restrictions in a sorted order there is no more difference (in
>  > my printout). So I assume that the binary output is also the same.
>  >
>  > I am not sure why the difference does not appear in other tiles.
>  >
>  > WanMil
>  >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev