[mkgmap-dev] access=no//access=private on short lines vs long lines
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Thu Aug 30 10:55:05 BST 2012
On 30.08.2012 11:48, WanMil wrote: > > I think so. All functions require a flag if they support points, > lines, polygons and relations. If the ::length function implement the > calculation of a route length then the relation flag would be true. > Anyhow I expect a lots of cases with specialised handling. e.g. a > route relation might have members tagged with forward/backward. A > simple implementation would count the length of all members which > might be twice the real route length. > > That sounds cool. For my maps I don't think that it matters. Bicycle or Hiking or MTB Routes usually don't have backward/forward members. For bus or tram routes, the matter would be clearly important. For me a simple length calculation is all that matters. Most importantly for ways, if not too complicated for relations, then even better. -- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] access=no//access=private on short lines vs long lines
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] access=no//access=private on short lines vs long lines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list