[mkgmap-dev] Suggestion for more flexibility in locator part of mkgmap
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Tue Sep 18 12:26:19 BST 2012
> Sorry for resurrecting this old thread. Many rural villages, hamlets (and > even some small towns) are not administrative areas or have their own town > council etc so administrative boundaries are not the best choice here to be > able to assign addresses correctly. > > To make locator more flexible for assiging addresses, could it also be > extended to also support the place tag? eg > mkgmap:place:village mkgmap:place:hamlet mkgmap:place:locality > mkgmap:place:suburb etc > > Thanks How should mkgmap assign the mkgmap:place:* tags? Should it use the nearest algorithm? In this case isn't it rather the same like using location-autofill=nearest? Can you please give a real example in which this helps? I want to understand the idea. WanMil
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Suggestion for more flexibility in locator part of mkgmap
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Suggestion for more flexibility in locator part of mkgmap
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list