[mkgmap-dev] Still problems with lakes
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Sep 23 08:54:44 BST 2012
Hello Henning, > Sonds like an easy workaround without to much data, which have to > cached. A manual list would be a good thing, because mainly you as a > user know, which polygons are problematic. I like the idea of a list, however it is produced. I wanted to create the list automatically, but it was too big because of false candidates. As long as no one finds an effecient and correct algorithm to create the list in splitter, we can at least use it to produce correct output in splitter and to verify that mkgmap produces good maps with it. The last point is quite important: mkgmap contains a lot of routines to handle incomplete or wrong or redundant data. That makes it very difficult to verify wether a change in splitter is producing better maps. > > Maybe mkgmap could throw out a csv-list of each polygon and > multipolygon, which is causing problems. I am not sure if mkgmap really detects all ids that cause problems. I think it can't do that if the problem is a missing relation (in one tile), but maybe mkgmap sees the same relation id again in other tiles and reports it then. > > r<id>, <link to object > (for mp) > w<id>, <link to object> (for p) > > So the user could have a view to the polygon and could start after > checking the list a second run. Well, dependent on the input I expect the list can contain thousands of ids, so I doubt that you will want to look at that. > > Of course it won't help, if you don't use a fix areas.list Hmm, as long as the input files dont change, splitter will always produce the same areas.list, so I see no big problem here. It doesn't harm if the list of problematic ids contains a few ids that are no longer problematic, as long as it is complete. The automatic algorithm that I implemented creates a complete list, but that list contains too many false entries (I guess the ratio is something like 1:100 (100 false entries for one really problematic id) > > Also wo could start a wiki-page and collect problematic objects. > > Henning Thanks for the feedback. I'll try coding a few changes (e.g. filtering by tags), if that doesn't work out, I'll code the handling of a external list and we'll see what it helps. Gerd > Am 21.09.2012 14:59, schrieb toc-rox: > > If a list with the IDs of all huge polygons is helpful, such a list could > > perhaps created by > > - user (manually) > > - mkgmap (automatic) > > > > Regards Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20120923/f63083b0/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Still problems with lakes
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Still problems with lakes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list